Measured on two neighbouring boneless ranges (merging their fragments):
- 99.8% of fragment files were single articles of a random-named
'file' of >100 parts: a random subject per article, which never
completes from headers. They now count as per-article.
- A file is kept as a fragment when its first part seen is above 1 and
comes within the start window (the idle window: uploads in busy groups
spread over minutes, and a 50k-article edge zone is ~30 s of boneless),
or when it was still open at the range's end with later parts missing.
Anything else missing parts is incomplete and only counted.
Per range: 70,308 → 130 fragment files; merged, 47 of the 48 files met
complete (57,558 segments, ~8% of the range's kept segments).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
End to end (workstation, recent a.b.boneless ranges from the spool): a 2M
range in 10–12 s, 166k–202k headers/s per worker process (edge:bench on
one core: 215k).
- Prefetcher: spooled_at was set against a total counted from the range's
resume point, which shrinks as the worker advances: the last chunks were
never fetched and the worker waited. Now counted against the whole
range, only new chunks counted, and leased ranges are always checked
against the files. Planned ranges ahead are bounded (it had spooled ever
more); the spool size is measured every 30 s (a stat per file).
- The stream sends an empty frame every 20 s while waiting for a chunk
(Node's fetch gave up on a quiet body after 5 minutes).
- A range taken over midway: the first batch starts at the resume point
(it started at the range's start and was refused).
- edge:node inflates the next chunk on the thread pool while indexing the
current one, and doesn't wait for a post before indexing on (posts stay
in order; a failed post stops the range).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The worker reads the XOVER reply's text directly: fields by position, the
owner from the Xref without arrays (crossposts leave before any subject
parsing), a subject parsed once per file (cached without its segment
counter), a file's details as one shared object, dates as numbers.
Garbage collection had been ~22% of the time.
Same results as parseOverviews + segmentFromHeader on 800k real lines.
edge:bench (one core): boneless 137k → 193k headers/s (CPU 21 → 12.8 s),
ath (2013) 143k → 303k; peak RSS 1.15 / 0.87 GB.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
End to end on the workstation (coordinator:run, the API, edge:node, real
NNTP): a.b.e-book.french and a.b.cd.image.playstation2.dvdiso ranges.
- Prefetcher: every connection takes the next missing chunk (leased
ranges first, in order); one connection per range (~26k lines/s) kept
the worker waiting
- executable rule: releases of bare executables (malware floods named
after films and software) are dropped; they were 92% of the catalog rows
of the test ranges, 21% of the segments
- fragments per file (details once) and gzipped batch bodies; the JSON
limit (1 MB by default) raised to 256 MB, empty strings kept (a rule
count's key is '')
- release_chunks.batch_from is a bigint (boneless article numbers)
- tests get their own database; edge:bench --store times BatchStore:
1.3 s for a boneless range (1.24 ms per release chunk)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Overview chunks in, per batch out: releases as encoded chunks, probe
candidates, counts per rule (crossposts per owner group, obfuscated,
garbage, per-article, incomplete), a sample of what was dropped, and
fragments near the range's edges.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
